‘Don’t let Cameron divide us’-Multiculturalism & Islamic extremism

David Cameron’s party has a propensity to divide and rule, to blame the poor and to cause rifts within the various ethnic cultures which exist within Britian, so said George Galloway at a talk about multiculturalism I attended yesterday.

I heard David Cameron’s talk last month on February the 5th about multiculturalism where he said that “state multiculturalism has failed” and mentioned “the existence of an ideology-Islamic extremism” and, to be honest, I was not shocked by it, neither did it make my blood boil. The reason for this was not because he was right, or what he said resonated with me, but because I have become accustomed to this sort of rhetoric in order to gain political points. His singling out of Muslims did not surprise me either – especially when Islamophobia is now ubiquitous, or in the words of Baroness Warsi: “Islamophobia has now become acceptable.”

Martin Smith from the Love Music Hate Racism campaign argued at the rally last night that Mr Cameron chose to give his speech about multicultalism in Munich, the hub of anti Muslim sentiment, “the day after Labour went above Mr Cameron’s party on the polls, and the same day the EDL marched in Luton. He is copying [Angela] Merkel, [Nicolas] Sarkozy and the Swiss government in their attacks against the Muslim community.”

One theme prominent throughout the night was the idea that a lot of the backlash we face within our country is a result of the demonisation of Muslims and the continuing bombing of their countries. Therefore, is it really a surprise when a small minority become angered and fight back? As George Galloway said: “If you go to war with Muslims abroad you will make war with Muslims at home.” The 7/7 London bombers said explicitly in their videos that what they are doing was because of foreign policy.

What particularly angered many people – not just Muslims, about Mr Cameron’s speech –  was the fact that it was held on the same day as the EDL march against Muslims. Cameron’s speech, ironically, ended up strengthening the likes of the EDL and the BNP; and once you increase the popularity of these xenophobic, far right groups, multiculturalism will further disintegrate. Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP, gloated after Cameron’s speech that his party’s ideas are now entering the mainstream.

I am certainly not one to call Mr Cameron a fascist, a racist nor a xenophobe-like some of the speakers did at last night’s rally-but he, along with previous governments, have been much more tolerant of the different cultures and religions which exist within our society- as compared to other European countries. What I do take objection to, however, is the singling out of specific communities.

Islamic extremism does exist. But these irregular acts need to be treated as isolated incidents of criminality and not acts of terror by a religion as a whole. When the shootings in Arizona took place recently it was treated as an act of ‘insanity’ and not terrorism. Why should attacks by Muslims be treated any different?

As Mr Cameron closes libraries in areas which are predominantly black and asian, in the name of governmental cuts and multiculturalism, and as he continues to sell arms to autocrats who, as a result, suppress democracy, and oppose pluralism, he further espouses his double standards on multiculturalism.

One speaker from the East London Mosque said at the rally last night, that when his family first came to England, they suffered from an identity crisis-they didn’t know where they belonged. Wherever there lived, white people would move out, and when they did live amongst white people, they were often subject to ridicule and abuse. And therefore the asian and black community often lived with each other for safety reasons.

There is no doubt that Mr Cameron speaks from a position of vested interests, and if he was using multiculturalism as a euphemism for a attack on the Muslim community – as one speaker made clear – he was wrong in doing so. ‘Don’t let David Cameron divide us’ was the overall theme of the night. I agree. Our Prime Minister needs to be more careful in the future, if he is not, the cultural apartheid which still exists in our society today, will only be accentuated.

Omar Shahid


Add yours →

  1. muslims do not assimilate into western society because islam is a theocracy and demands supremacy. there is no radical, moderate, hijacked or any other nuanced semanticism type of islam. there is only islam which is based on the life of a murdering 8th century warlord.

    the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology.

    islam is a horrible ideology for human rights

    5 key things about islam

    1. mythical beliefs – all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.

    2. totalitarianism – islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.

    3. violence – islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.

    4. dishonesty – only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo’s peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.

    5. misogyny – present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.

    conclusions ??

    there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.

    islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

    • Not quite sure where you have gathered your information about Islam, but it is clearly from unreliable sources. I wouldn’t know where to start with a reply because most of it is factually wrong.

      I can only advise you to read more authoritative texts by exegetes, respected historians and scholars, not work written by bigots intent on espousing nonsense.

      Perhaps you may start by reading my post called: Islam exposed – if you havn’t done so already. Then listen to lectures by the western intellectual Hamaza Yusuf who reverted from Catholicism to Islam.

  2. A well written essay written with diplomacy. Grand.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: